|
|
|
Language is how
humans communicate. We have many languages depending on culture, and with
whom we’re trying to communicate within a culture, I.e. a sub-culture.
|
|
We use languages
to communicate with other ‘systems’. Systems, like computer systems, are
another type of culture.
|
|
The language we
use for business describes the non-verbal activities humans use to conduct
that business. The words and noises we make to conduct business record-able,
however, there are other queues in business that are not record-able, like
body language and facial movements, like the ‘evil eye’.
|
|
The ‘easy’ part
(which is also the part that requires the biggest shift in thinking) is the
language we use between the human and the human interface. In this, we try to
mimic as much of the human-to-human interaction as we can remember. ASIDE: I
see the users’ (corporate and general public) patience threshold diminishing
– the applications are trying to provide the human-to-human experience but
they fail horribly because they don’t cover enough contexts and over the
phone the applications are horrible. And, worst of all, these applications do
not allow for error. We are forcing citizens to think like programmers – who,
in the end (no aspersions of programmers) often use incorrect structures and
workflows to begin with. The problem is circular.
|